Creating long-lasting modification through storytelling

Difference-making thought-leader Tamsen Webster is the opening keynote at the ABA Bank Marketing Conference in September.

By Khalil Garriott

As an author, speaker and messaging strategist, Tamsen Webster assists specialists drive action with their concepts. Webster developed her hallmark Red Thread method in and for significant companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Harvard Medical School and Intel, in addition to with numerous private creators, academics and believed leaders.

“The best way to make big ideas irresistible is to build your audience’s case for those ideas, using their reasoning.” — Tamsen Webster.

Webster will provide the opening keynote at the 2023 ABA Bank Marketing Conference, Sept. 27-29 in Austin, Texas. She will provide on “The Logic of Emotion: How to Make Inaction Impossible.” In this Q&A, Webster sneak peeks her keynote session and explains how to make the most effective case for your concepts.

In 2 sentences, what is the significance behind The Red Thread?

The Red Thread is the story we inform ourselves about why things take place the method they do or will. The name originates from the legend of Theseus and the Minotaur, where Theseus utilized a red thread to discover his method and out of the Minotaur’s maze.

You have actually been determined as a thinker who is making a genuine distinction on the planet. What suggestions do you have for individuals who wish to make a distinction too?

Making a distinction simply for distinction’s sake isn’t enough; significance is needed. After all, modification can just take place when the conditions are right, and the very first and essential condition is that the modification provides on something individuals understand they desire (even if they don’t understand yet that the modification you’re making will get them there).

What’s the secret to making concepts alluring?

The finest method to make concepts alluring is to develop your audience’s case for those concepts, utilizing their thinking. It’s about rebuilding in somebody else’s mind the conditions that produced the concept in your own. One of those conditions is the “story” element I pointed out previously. We utilize the components of story to make things make good sense to ourselves (despite the fact that this takes place preconsciously the majority of the time). That implies your concept currently has a story—the story that made it make good sense to you.

When you can rebuild that Red Thread in somebody else’s mind-—from their point of view and in their language—you’re publishing the “code” of your concept directly into their brain’s story processors. Once you’ve done that, you have a story they not just comprehend, however will act on. Because it’s a story they not just comprehend, however think.

What’s the distinction in between a reasonable choice maker and a justifying choice maker?

The initially one doesn’t really exist! Humans aren’t anything BUT justifying choice makers. Our real choice making is preconscious, and we inform ourselves stories later to validate what we do. What that implies is that we don’t do things just due to the fact that they’re ideal or logical—though our company believe we do. Instead, we persuade ourselves that what we do currently is ideal and logical due to the fact that we’re currently doing it.

How do you produce that “lightbulb moment” for your audience—material that makes your audience take an action?

It’s inadequate to simply provide the problem-solution reasoning of your concept to your audience. That just offers the start and completion of the story. To get somebody to see how they can get that ending, too (or how somebody else did), they need to comprehend why that took place. In all terrific stories, there’s a minute that identifies that “why,” and it’s called the crucial moment. It’s the minute when the primary character understands something about the real nature of their situations—something that puts what they desire in jeopardy and makes the status quo difficult to neglect.

To produce that minute for somebody else, you require to put the exact same story components in location: something somebody desires, an issue they need to fix prior to they can get what they desire and some inarguable reality that makes accomplishing both of those difficult with the present strategy. At that minute, something called “cognitive dissonance” makes somebody select because minute—they’ll either choose they don’t desire a specific thing after all, or they’ll choose to alter something to get it.

If an individual is not sure how to begin developing material that motivates long-lasting modification, how would you direct them?

I might compose a book simply on that concern! But the 2 essential concepts are these: Change is based upon story (the stories we inform ourselves), and those stories are based upon beliefs (what our company believe to be real about ourselves and the world). That implies the very best method to begin developing material that motivates long-lasting modification is to (a) develop a story that (b) is anchored in what individuals currently desire and currently think.

The greatest barrier to long-lasting modification is something called “cognitive inertia,” keeping the beliefs we currently have and the stories we currently inform ourselves. It’s why attempting to get somebody to desire or think something brand-new typically doesn’t work; the old beliefs and stories are simply too strong. But when you develop a case for modification based upon somebody’s pre-existing positions, you make cognitive inertia operate in your favor. You’re ensuring that even the greatest leaps begin with strong ground.

Kahlil Garriott is VP, imaginative material and copywriting technique at ABA.


A news media journalist always on the go, I've been published in major publications including VICE, The Atlantic, and TIME.

Related Articles

Back to top button