Receive complimentary War in Ukraine updates
We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest e-mail assembling the most recent War in Ukraine news every early morning.
Europe’s most significant business have actually suffered a minimum of €100bn in direct losses from their operations in Russia given that President Vladimir Putin’s major intrusion of Ukraine in 2015, according to analysis by the Financial Times.
A study of 600 European groups’ yearly reports and 2023 monetary declarations reveals that 176 business have actually taped possession problems, foreign exchange-related charges and other one-off costs as an outcome of the sale, closure or decrease of Russian organizations.
The aggregate figure does not consist of the war’s indirect macroeconomic effects such as greater energy and products expenses. The war has actually likewise provided an earnings increase for oil and gas groups and defence business.
Moscow’s choice to take control of the Russian organizations of gas importers Fortum and Uniper in April, followed by the expropriation of Danone and Carlsberg last month, recommends more discomfort lies ahead, according to experts.
More than 50 percent of the 1,871 European-owned entities in Russia prior to the war are still running in the nation, according to information assembled by the Kyiv School of Economics. European business still present in Russia consist of Italy’s UniCredit, Austria’s Raiffeisen, Switzerland’s Nestlé and the UK’s Unilever.
“Even if a company lost a lot of money leaving Russia, those who stay risk much bigger losses,” stated Nabi Abdullaev, partner at tactical consultancy Control Risks. “It turns out that cut and run was the best strategy for companies deciding what to do at the start of the war. The faster you left, the lower your loss.”
The heaviest expenses of withdrawal are focused in a couple of exposed sectors. Those with the most significant writedowns and charges are oil and gas groups, where 3 business alone — BP, Shell and TotalEnergies — reported combined charges of €40.6bn. The losses were far surpassed by greater oil and gas rates, which assisted these groups report bumper aggregate earnings of about €95bn ($104bn) in 2015. Defence business’ shares have actually been buoyed by the dispute.
Utilities took a direct hit of €14.7bn, while commercial business, consisting of carmakers, have actually suffered a €13.6bn blow. Financial business consisting of banks, insurance companies and financial investment companies, have actually taped €17.5bn in writedowns and other charges.
Simon Evenett, economics teacher at University of St Gallen, stated: “You have a small number of companies which have taken a big hit. Once you get away from big ticket charges, the average writedown is probably fairly manageable given the limited Russian footprint.”
Looking at worldwide financial investment streams into Russia, “even if Europeans were the only investors there, which they are not, the country would account for just 3.5 per cent of their total outward investments”, he stated.
BP reported a $25.5bn charge, revealing 3 days after the intrusion that it would offer its 19.75 percent stake in state-owned oil group Rosneft.
It took TotalEnergies longer to report an overall expense of $14.8bn. The French energy group has yet to jot down its 20 percent stake in the Yamal LNG task. Shell took a $4.1bn charge, while Norwegian oil and gas groups Equinor and OMV have actually reported €1bn and €2.5bn respectively.
German group Wintershall Dea in January stated the Kremlin’s expropriation of its Russia service had actually cleaned €2bn of money from its savings account. In turn Wintershall’s owner BASF jotted down its stake in the energy explorer by €6.5bn.
Uniper, which was bailed out by the German state in 2015, reserved €5.7bn in problems, while Finland’s Fortum took a €5.3bn hit.
Eleven carmakers took a combined €6.4bn in charges. Renault crossed out €2.3bn after offering its Moscow plant and the stake in Russia’s Avtovaz in May 2022. Volkswagen reported a €2bn writedown and in May Moscow authorized the sale of VW’s regional properties, consisting of a plant utilizing 4,000 individuals, which were still valued at Rbs111.3bn (€1.5bn) in 2015, according to business disclosures.
In the monetary sector, France’s Société Générale surrendered in April 2022, offering Rosbank and its insurance coverage activities to Vladimir Potanin, an ally of Putin, taking a €3.1bn hit while doing so. But just a handful of the 45 western banks with Russian subsidiaries have actually left the nation, partially since of restraints enforced by Moscow.
Raiffeisen, still the biggest western bank in the nation, has actually taken €1bn in writedowns and other charges. The lending institution has stated it is checking out a sale of its Russian system, which it values at €1bn presently.
UniCredit, which has actually pledged to discover a purchaser for its regional service, has actually represented a €1.3bn hit, while Italy’s Intesa Sanpaolo took a €1.4bn charge.
The groups still running in Russia are taking a high-risk gamble, stated Anna Vlasyuk, research study fellow at KSE. The tighter exit guidelines presented by Moscow given that the start of the war has actually made expropriation most likely and drawing out any dividends out of these organizations is nearly difficult, she stated.
“Companies still there would be better off just writing the business off. I don’t think anyone is secure,” she stated. “What was the pretext for appropriating Carlsberg? Is it really a national security issue? I don’t think so.”
Additional reporting by Laura Pitel in Berlin, Marton Dunai in Budapest, Patricia Nilsson and Olaf Storbeck in Frankfurt, Sarah White, Sylvia Pfeifer, Peter Campbell, Madeleine Speed, Tom Wilson and Leke Oso Alabi in London, Barney Jopson in Madrid, Silvia Sciorilli Borelli in Milan, and Raphael Minder in Warsaw.