House Republicans desire FDIC to think about local banks in proposed evaluation

The FDIC requires to think about the results on mid-size and local banks as it moves on with a proposed unique evaluation to recuperate the expenses of safeguarding uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, a group of 13 House legislators stated today. In a letter to FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg, the legislators stated the evaluation “is not occurring in a vacuum,” as it comes at the exact same time as banking regulators think about increased capital requirements for banks with more than $100 billion in possessions. Among the signatories were House Financial Services subcommittee Chairs Andy Barr (R-Ky.) and Ann Wagner (R-Mo.).

“Combined, those anticipated changes and the special FDIC assessment will have disproportionate and lasting repercussions on borrowers, depositors and communities served by regional banks,” the legislators stated. “Those banks will be faced with difficult choices of where and how to deploy fewer resources for consumers and customers, and reduced credit opportunities will result.”

The proposed evaluation would excuse the very first $5 billion in uninsured deposits. The legislators stated the evaluation base need to be based upon a date no earlier than March 31, 2023, “to ensure an accurate and fair reflection of balances in uninsured deposits that existed at the time of the systemic risk determination.” Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) revealed comparable issues about the evaluation in a July letter to the FDIC.


A news media journalist always on the go, I've been published in major publications including VICE, The Atlantic, and TIME.

Related Articles

Back to top button