By Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM
Q: Beneath Regulation Z (Fact in Lending Act), collectors should ship a revised Mortgage Estimate to a mortgage applicant if the financial institution needs to cost the applicant for an extension of an expired price lock settlement. If the financial institution is conscious of will increase to different charges unrelated to the extension of the speed lock settlement, should it replace these unrelated charges on the revised Mortgage Estimate or might it wait till the Closing Disclosure to regulate these charges?
A: The financial institution should replace the Mortgage Estimate. Beneath §1026.19(e)(4), if the financial institution needs to extend or add a charge that was not disclosed on the preliminary Mortgage Estimate, the financial institution should re-disclose inside three enterprise days of studying of the charge improve or the brand new charge. As well as, all charges should be up to date “primarily based on the most effective info fairly accessible to the creditor on the time the revised disclosures are offered.” As Remark 5 to §1026.19(e)(3)(iv) explains:
For instance, if the creditor points revised disclosures reflecting a brand new price lock extension charge for function of figuring out good religion [of estimates], different expenses unrelated to the speed lock extension should be mirrored on the revised disclosures primarily based on the most effective info fairly accessible to the creditor on the time the revised disclosures are offered.
(Reply offered March 2021.)
Q: Part 215.4(b) of Regulation O permits banks to make loans to coated events (insiders) as much as a sure aggregated quantity with out the prior approval of the financial institution’s board of administrators. The board’s prior approval is required, nevertheless, for loans that exceed that aggregated mortgage quantity restrict. In order that insiders who’ve reached that restrict do not need to attend for the board to fulfill so as to get approval for extra loans, might the board problem a blanket approval for any future mortgage requests that exceed the restrict?
Q: My financial institution has a compliance query associated to doing in enterprise in Spanish. As a result of the financial institution is positioned near the U.S.-Mexican border, the financial institution has posted indicators in each English and Spanish all through the financial institution’s branches associated to COVID-19 safety precautions (dimension limits, masks necessities, and so forth.) Our financial institution doesn’t promote in Spanish, however a number of the financial institution’s customer support representatives and tellers do converse with clients in Spanish. Is the financial institution obligated to supply clients with account disclosures in Spanish due to our COVID signage?
A: No. Posting COVID signage in languages aside from English just isn’t promoting and doesn’t set off any regulatory necessities.
Talking to a shopper in a language aside from English at account opening doesn’t set off any necessities to supply disclosures in one other language beneath federal legislation, however banks ought to take a look at state legislation. Some states, corresponding to California, have very stringent and detailed legal guidelines addressing the supply of companies to clients in languages aside from English.
There are additionally particular federal rules addressing “doing enterprise in a language aside from English” that fluctuate relying on what the financial institution is doing. Beneath the remittance provisions of §1005.31(g) of Regulation E, for instance, promoting remittances in a language aside from English or having a remittance switch dialogue in a language aside from English will set off the necessities to supply all disclosures in that different language in addition to in English. (Reply offered March 2021.)
Q: I’ve a query in regards to the definition of a multifamily dwelling beneath Regulation C (Dwelling Mortgage Disclosure Act). Regulation C defines a multifamily dwelling as a “dwelling . . . that accommodates 5 or extra particular person dwelling models” (§1003.2[n]). My financial institution has a mortgage mortgage secured by two properties. One property is a duplex. The second property is a triplex. Because the property is secured by 5 particular person dwelling models, is the mortgage secured by a “multifamily dwelling” beneath Regulation C?
A: No, this mortgage wouldn’t be secured by a multifamily dwelling. As famous in your query, a multifamily dwelling is one which “accommodates” 5 or extra particular person dwelling models. Neither of the properties you describe “accommodates” 5 models. For functions of this a part of the definition, the 5 models should be in the identical construction (Remark 2 to §1003.2[n]). (Reply offered March 2021.)
Solutions are offered by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, CAMS, senior director of compliance outreach and growth; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Coverage and Compliance. Solutions don’t present, nor are they supposed to substitute for, skilled authorized recommendation. Solutions have been present as of the response date proven on the finish of every merchandise.