New York City suspends community deposits at Capital One, KeyBank

A vote Thursday by the New York City Banking Commission indicates that KeyBank and Capital One will not get community deposits from the city for approximately 2 years.


The New York City Banking Commission voted Thursday to stop transferring city funds at Capital One Bank and KeyBank, stating that the banks stopped working to satisfy a requirement that they record their efforts to fight discrimination in loaning and work.

As an outcome of the 3-0 vote, Capital One and Key will not get brand-new community deposits from New York City for approximately 2 years. They likewise will not be enabled to restore agreements or participate in brand-new arrangements with the city throughout the suspension.

Capital One held $7.2 million in New York City deposits throughout 108 accounts at the end of April, while KeyBank held $10 million throughout 3 accounts, according to a declaration from the city’s banking commission following a public hearing Thursday.

The 2 banks “outright refused” to send necessary accreditations, which showed an absence of effort to “root out discrimination,” the banking commission’s declaration stated.

A KeyBank representative stated Thursday that the bank supplied the needed details to the New York City Banking Commission.

“This is a misunderstanding and we look forward to clarifying this issue with the Banking Commission,” the representative stated in an e-mail.

The KeyBank representative likewise rejected discrimination in any of the bank’s operations and stated that the bank does not presently hold deposits with the City of New York.

A Capital One representative stated in an e-mail that the McLean, Virginia-based lending institution forbids discrimination versus workers and customers, which its submission to New York City authorities was “consistent” with what it sent in previous years.

In February, New York City tightened its guidelines for banks that wish to get community deposits. The brand-new guidelines consist of a requirement that banks supply information about their anti-discriminatory loaning and work practices.

“Banks seeking to do business with New York City must demonstrate that they will be responsible managers of public funds and responsible actors in our communities,” Comptroller Brad Lander, who belongs to the New York City Banking Commission, stated in a declaration.

The vote in the country’s biggest city drew appreciation from the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, which just recently asked federal regulators to examine Key’s home loan loaning practices for supposed redlining.

“KeyBank and Capital One have atrocious track records of not just under-serving but actively harming the interests of low-wealth communities and people of color,” Jesse Van Tol, president and CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, stated in a news release.

During Thursday’s conference, Lander likewise voted versus making 3 other banks — Wells Fargo, PNC Bank and International Finance Bank — qualified to get the city’s deposits.

Lander implicated those 3 banks of stopping working to avoid discrimination. But he was not signed up with by the 2 other members of the Banking Commission — Deputy Comptroller for Policy Annie Levers and Tonya Jenerette, designee to the commission for Mayor Eric Adams — and the 3 banks were accredited to get New York City deposits.

A Wells Fargo representative stated the San Francisco-based bank values its relationship with New York City. “We are ready to continue serving its needs today and well into the future,” the Wells representative stated in an e-mail.

Spokespeople for PNC and International Finance Bank did not react to ask for remark.

During Thursday’s hearing, the banking commission likewise voted all to accredit 23 other banks to get city deposits over the next 2 years.

The hearing was the very first time that the city enabled public remarks about its classification procedure. Residents and activists who participated in spoke up versus banks that were looking for to hold community deposits, getting in touch with city authorities to rather develop a public bank.

Allowing public remarks is a “key first step toward establishing a public bank to hold city deposits and reinvest in communities,” Andy Morrison, associate director of the New Economy Project, stated throughout the hearing.

“We urge the commission to use the full extent of its authority to ensure that public dollars work for the public good,” Morrison stated.

Other speakers slammed banks for adding to environment modification, and for offering funding for unjust real estate practices.

Alice Hu, senior environment advocate at New York Communities for Change, indicated banks’ loans to oil business, stating that severe weather condition occasions due to environment modification effect lower-income New Yorkers “first and worst.”

Barika Williams, executive director at the Association for the Neighborhood & Housing Development, prompted city authorities to use additional analysis in approving deposit classifications to banks.

“There must be additional efforts taken to deepen community engagement,” Williams stated throughout the hearing. “[Banks’] ability to hold and profit from New Yorkers’ hard-earned city deposits should be a privilege, not a right, and one they should be required to earn.”


A news media journalist always on the go, I've been published in major publications including VICE, The Atlantic, and TIME.

Related Articles

Back to top button