Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit: Former SEC Official Argues Potential Success Of Interlocutory Appeal

There have actually been a number of arguments on the probability of the court giving the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) movement for an interlocutory appeal in its legal fight versus Ripple Labs. Following this, a previous SEC authorities has actually come out to offer his viewpoint on the probability of this taking place. 

Will The SEC’s Motion Be Granted?

Former SEC authorities Marc Fagel noted on his X (previously Twitter) manage that the “specific requirements for an interlocutory appeal are hard to meet.” As such, he thinks the chances protest the SEC, and the Commission’s demand is most likely to be rejected. 

Fagel’s tweet can be found in reaction to a question directed at him by a member of the XRP neighborhood. The user had actually requested for Fagel’s viewpoint on the probability of the court giving the SEC’s ask for an interlocutory appeal and if specific aspects might affect the court’s choice. 

These aspects consisted of the reality that the SEC’s case versus Ripple appeared “important” for the crypto market and how it verged on unique locations of law. The X user likewise discussed that there were presently contrasting judgments relating to the variations in the Terraform and Ripple cases.

In Terraform’s case, the judge stated that cryptocurrencies might be securities, and it didn’t matter if they were offered straight or not to financiers. Meanwhile, in the Ripple case, Judge Torres ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales and other circulations didn’t make up financial investment agreements. 

Despite the chances protesting the SEC, Fagel stated that these aspects, which the user discussed, might increase the Commission’s possibilities of being approved an interlocutory appeal if the court were to think about those bottom lines. 

XRP rate drops to $0.48 | Source: XRPUSD on

SEC’s Crypto Enforcement “Largely Successful”

Many, particularly in the crypto neighborhood, had actually suggested that the SEC’s losses versus Ripple and Grayscale showed that the Commission was stopping working in its clampdown on the crypto market. Despite this, Fagel believes that the SEC’s crypto enforcement actions have actually been “largely successful.”

Fagel kept in mind that the SEC just suffered a partial loss in the summary judgment provided by Judge Analisa Torres and had the ability to show that the crypto company “illegally raised $700M in unregistered securities sales.”

He mentions that the SEC still has “tough battles ahead” in its crypto enforcement actions. In his viewpoint, the “exchange case” positions unique and tough concerns, which the SEC may have problem making its argument stick in court. 

The “exchange case” in this context is more than likely about the SEC’s case versus Binance and Coinbase, a lot of particularly with the latter filing a movement to dismiss the suit on the ground that the Commission doesn’t have regulative jurisdiction over crypto sales on exchanges as these tokens do not certify as securities. 

Featured image from iStock, chart from

Related Articles

Back to top button