South Dakota regulators reject ask for CO2 pipeline

South Dakota regulators on Monday turned down an authorization application for a suggested co2 pipeline through the state, dealing a fresh obstacle to the business behind the multistate task after North Dakota declined a siting license for another leg there.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission voted all to deny Summit Carbon Solutions’ application to construct a 469-mile (755-kilometer) in-state path — part of a desired $5.5 billion, 2,000-mile (3,220-kilometer) pipeline network through 5 states.

The choice makes complex a currently intricate procedure for Summit Carbon Solutions as it looks for comparable permission in other states in the middle of opposition from landowners and ecological groups. The proposed network would bring planet-warming co2 emissions from more than 30 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota for long-term underground storage in main North Dakota.

After the South Dakota vote, Summit revealed it means “to refine its proposal and reapply for a permit in a timely manner.”

The task would utilize carbon capture innovation, what advocates view as a contender of environment modification, though challengers slam its efficiency at scale and the requirement for possibly big financial investments over less expensive renewable resource sources.New federal tax rewards and billions of dollars from Congress towards carbon capture efforts have actually made such tasks profitable.

The South Dakota panel’s vote began a movement made Friday by commission personnel. They stated Summit’s proposed path would breach county regulations including obstacle ranges. The panel on Monday was to have actually started a weekslong hearing for Summit’s proposition, however the hearing was adjourned and will not continue.

“It makes little sense to go through the motions of a three-week evidentiary hearing and all that would follow without a compliant route that can be permitted,” Commission Staff Attorney Kristen Edwards stated.

Summit on Thursday had actually dropped a movement for preempting county regulations, guidelines which lawyer Brett Koenecke composed “have the intended or unintended effect of hampering projects like this one.” He pointed out the panel’s consentaneous choice Wednesday to reject a comparable demand by Navigator CO2 Ventures for its suggested pipeline, to which the commission likewise rejected a building and construction license.

Commission Vice Chair Gary Hanson stated an authorization might not be lawfully released if the evidenced revealed the candidate is presently not able to adhere to existing statutes and guidelines, including “that’s the challenge that we’re having here.”

“I believe that the applicant will be able to come back with, eventually, a clean application, and when they do, that is when it is proper to examine it,” Hanson stated.

Summit CEO Lee Blank stated in a declaration, “We respect this initial ruling and remain committed to South Dakota and deeply appreciative of the overwhelming support we have received from landowners and community members. We are hopeful that through collaborative engagement with these counties we can forge a path forward to benefit South Dakota and its citizens.”

Much of Monday’s hearing concentrated on how the panel would continue depending upon the panel’s action on the movement to reject. The commission likewise beat an alternative movement that would have basically delayed the hearing forever.

Koenecke had actually asked the commission to postpone the procedures for him to propose a brand-new scheduling order in the future.

Omaha-based lawyer Brian Jorde, who represents numerous individuals Summit has actually taken legal action against in South Dakota to take their land for its pipeline, stated Summit’s proposed path in the state provided an “impossibility” to the panel, with a path that “cannot be constructed.”

The choice Monday comes as other states continue to weigh Summit’s task.

The Iowa Utilities Board started its Summit hearing last month, anticipated to recentlies. The hearing is arranged to resume Tuesday with Summit witnesses.

North Dakota regulators last month rejected Summit a siting license for its 320-mile (515-kilometer) proposed path through the state. Summit consequently asked that state’s Public Service Commission to reevaluate. The panel held a work session Friday on the demand, with a choice yet to come.

Minnesota regulators voted last month to continue with an ecological evaluation for a little part of the general task, a 28-mile (45-kilometer) section in Minnesota that would link an ethanol plant in Fergus Falls to the North Dakota line, where it would get in touch with Summit’s wider network.


News and digital media editor, writer, and communications specialist. Passionate about social justice, equity, and wellness. Covering the news, viewing it differently.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button