Texas argues both sides about rights of a coming fetus

The state of Texas is questioning the legal rights of an “unborn child” in refuting a claim brought by a jail guard who states she had a stillborn child since jail authorities declined to let her leave work for more than 2 hours after she started feeling extreme discomforts comparable to contractions.

The argument from the Texas attorney general of the United States’s workplace seems in stress with positions it has actually formerly taken in safeguarding abortion limitations, competing all the method approximately the U.S. Supreme Court that “unborn children” need to be acknowledged as individuals with legal rights.

It likewise contrasts with declarations by Texas’ Republican leaders, consisting of Gov. Greg Abbott, who has actually promoted the state’s abortion restriction as securing “every unborn child with a heartbeat.”

The state attorney general of the United States’s workplace did not instantly react to concerns about its argument in a court filing that an “unborn child” might not have rights under the U.S. Constitution. In March, attorneys for the state argued that the guard’s fit “conflates” how a fetus is dealt with under state law and the Constitution.

“Just because several statutes define an individual to include an unborn child does not mean that the Fourteenth Amendment does the same,” they composed in legal filing that kept in mind that the guard lost her child prior to the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the federal right to an abortion developed under its landmark Roe v. Wade choice.

That claim was available in action to a federal suit brought in 2015 by Salia Issa, who declares that healthcare facility personnel informed her they might have conserved her child had she got here faster. Issa was 7 months’ pregnant in 2021, when she reported for work at a state jail in the West Texas city of Abilene and started having a pregnancy emergency situation.

Her lawyer, Ross Brennan, did not instantly provide any remark. He composed in a court filing that the state’s argument is “nothing more than an attempt to say — without explicitly saying — that an unborn child at seven months gestation is not a person.”

While operating at the jail, Issa started sensation discomforts “similar to a contraction” however when she asked to be relived from her post to go to the healthcare facility her managers declined and implicated her of lying, according to the grievance she submitted together with her partner. It states the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s policy states that a corrections officer can be fired for leaving their post prior to being relived by another guard.

Issa was ultimately relieved and drove herself to the healthcare facility, where she went through emergency situation surgical treatment, the fit states.

Issa, whose fit was initially reported by The Texas Tribune, is looking for financial damages to cover her medical costs, discomfort and suffering, and other things, consisting of the funeral service expenditures of the coming kid. The state attorney general of the United States’s workplace and jail system have actually asked a judge to dismiss the case.

Laura Hermer, a teacher at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, explained Texas’ legal posture as “seeking to have their cake and eat it too.”

“This would not be the first time that the state has sought to claim to support the right to life of all fetuses, yet to act quite differently when it comes to protecting the health and safety of such fetuses other than in the very narrow area of prohibiting abortions,” Hermer stated.

Last week, U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower suggested that the case be permitted to continue, in part, without dealing with the arguments over the rights of the fetus.


News and digital media editor, writer, and communications specialist. Passionate about social justice, equity, and wellness. Covering the news, viewing it differently.

Related Articles

Back to top button